The bill narrows some procedural protections and adds DOJ reporting and limited provider safeguards, but it expands and preserves significant secrecy authorities that delay notice and risk chilling journalism and reducing external oversight.
State and local governments (and courts) must get written, fact‑based findings and narrowly tailor nondisclosure orders, which reduces overbroad secrecy and helps protect due process.
Tech companies and their employees can share information internally with legal counsel and necessary staff to obtain legal advice and comply with process without violating nondisclosure orders, enabling providers to meet legal obligations and manage responses.
The Department of Justice must report annually by district on the use and effects of delayed or precluded notice, increasing transparency about secret orders and their impact on media and enforcement outcomes.
Named customers/subscribers can be kept unaware of government searches of their communications for up to 90 days (and up to 1 year for certain child‑sex offenses), delaying their ability to learn of and challenge searches.
The bill preserves broad secrecy powers and limits external oversight (including barring providers from notifying courts/government when nondisclosure orders expire), increasing the risk that searches remain hidden and reducing transparency and accountability.
Expanded authority for secret orders that can cover news‑media members risks chilling investigative journalism and lawful speech despite reporting requirements.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Allows courts to issue temporary nondisclosure orders preventing providers from notifying customers about certain electronic-warrant/subpoena requests, with time limits and required judicial findings.
Introduced November 17, 2025 by Scott Fitzgerald · Last progress November 17, 2025
Amends the federal law that governs whether and when service providers must notify customers about government warrants, orders, or subpoenas for electronic communications. It allows courts to issue temporary nondisclosure (gag) orders telling providers not to notify anyone about such process, subject to specific time limits, required factual findings, and narrow-tailoring requirements; longer gag periods (up to one year) are allowed in child-exploitation cases, while most other investigations are limited to 90 days. The bill also requires applicants to state whether the targeted account holder is aware of the process or suspected of wrongdoing, and forbids gag orders that force providers to report when the gag expires.