Sponsors (2)
The bill increases venue clarity and reduces forum shopping by tying cases to the circuit where business is transacted, but does so at the cost of limiting NLRB-wide uniformity, creating unequal protections across circuits, and prompting additional venue litigation.
Unions, their members, and employers will have clearer and more predictable venue rules because unfair labor practice cases must conform to the federal appellate precedent where the alleged conduct arose.
Unions and small-business owners will face reduced forum shopping and litigation uncertainty because venue is tied to where a party 'transacts business' rather than broader prior language.
Unions and small-business owners will see the NLRB's ability to issue nationwide precedent limited because the Board would be constrained to follow circuit-specific appellate precedent, reducing national uniformity in labor law.
Employees and employers in circuits with narrower appellate rulings will receive less expansive protections or remedies compared with other circuits, producing unequal rights and remedies depending on location.
Small-business owners and unions may incur increased litigation costs because parties are likely to litigate over what it means to 'transact business' when contesting proper venue.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires NLRB orders to conform to the controlling appellate decision in the circuit where the alleged unfair labor practice occurred and shortens venue language to where a party "transacts business."
Introduced November 6, 2025 by Bill Cassidy · Last progress November 6, 2025
Requires the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to issue orders that do not conflict with the controlling decision of the U.S. court of appeals for the circuit where the alleged unfair labor practice occurred, and tightens venue language by replacing broader phrases with the shorter term "transacts business." The change directs the Board to follow local circuit precedent in unfair labor practice cases and narrows where cases may be brought based on where a party transacts business.