Sponsors
The bill strengthens U.S. tools to shield domestic industry and protect critical supply chains and IP from unfair practices, but does so at the cost of higher consumer and producer prices, elevated risk of Chinese retaliation and supply disruptions, and increased legal and economic uncertainty.
Import-competing U.S. manufacturers and workers (including small businesses) will face less competition from Chinese goods, helping preserve jobs and domestic market share.
The President would have clearer authority to impose stronger trade remedies, raise duties, and invoke security exceptions (e.g., Article XXI) to protect critical supply chains and national security (for example, export controls on strategic inputs).
Asserting security exceptions and targeted trade measures may deter intellectual property theft and forced technology transfer, helping protect American R&D and high‑tech jobs.
Consumers and businesses that buy Chinese-made goods will likely pay higher prices because of increased tariffs and trade measures.
China could retaliate (tariffs or export controls on critical inputs such as rare earths), which would harm U.S. exporters and agricultural producers and could disrupt domestic supply chains and energy sectors.
Higher import costs for Chinese inputs would raise production costs for U.S. companies that rely on those inputs, risking layoffs and further price increases.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Introduced December 18, 2025 by Richard Lynn Scott · Last progress December 18, 2025
Revokes normal trade relations treatment for goods from the People’s Republic of China and replaces most-favored-nation tariff rates with higher column 2 duty rates in the U.S. tariff schedule, effective 90 days after the law goes into effect. It also authorizes the President to raise those duties further and defines the People’s Republic of China to include the PRC central government plus Hong Kong and Macau authorities. The bill records congressional findings that the PRC violated trade commitments, engaged in subsidies, intellectual property theft, tariff evasion, export controls, and other practices that harmed U.S. manufacturing, jobs, and economic security, and asserts that these harms justify revoking normal trade relations under the WTO national-security exception (GATT Article XXI).