This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Rewrites parts of the federal law that limit use of U.S. Armed Forces inside the United States to create a new congressional procedure to nullify any exception that would allow troops to be used domestically. It also adds a cross-reference allowing Congress to disapprove activations authorized under statutes that bring forces into states, and provides emergency FY2026 funding for federal grants that support state and local law enforcement and community violence prevention. The bill sets out a fast, rule-based joint-resolution process (special filing authorities, short committee deadlines, waived procedural roadblocks, and limits on debate) for Congress to terminate authorizations that would permit military involvement in domestic law enforcement, adds a severability rule, and appropriates $900 million+ for Justice Department grant programs while barring those funds from paying for assignment of federal law enforcement personnel to states or localities.
The bill strengthens congressional oversight of U.S. military activations and injects substantial federal funding into policing and violence-prevention programs, trading increased legislative control and local public-safety resources for greater risk of abrupt operational disruptions, politicization of deployments, centralized federal involvement, added federal spending, and civil‑liberties concerns.
Members of Congress gain a clear, expedited statutory authority to terminate authorizations/activations of U.S. Armed Forces (joint resolution and faster procedures), increasing legislative oversight of troop deployments.
Congressional procedures are shortened and the bill includes severability, reducing legislative delay and legal uncertainty so congressional checks and other provisions remain operational even if part of the statute is struck down.
State and local public-safety bodies receive substantial direct funding — $900 million total (including $600M JAG, $150M community violence intervention, $100M hiring grants, $50M emergency assistance) — to support investigations, hiring, violence-prevention, and emergency response.
The new congressional termination authority and fast-track procedures could abruptly constrain executive flexibility and cause sudden operational disruptions for deployed service members, politicizing military missions and harming readiness.
Waiving ordinary procedural protections and limiting debate shortens deliberation and can marginalize minority input on consequential uses of force, weakening democratic deliberation and oversight quality.
Taxpayers ultimately finance $900M in new appropriations for policing-related programs, increasing federal spending obligations.
Introduced November 7, 2025 by Elissa Slotkin · Last progress November 7, 2025