This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Prohibits the Department of Energy from using money in the Nuclear Waste Fund for repository siting or development activities unless it first enters written, binding agreements with the state governor, each affected local government, any contiguous local governments along transport routes, and each affected Indian tribe. Those agreements must be signed, binding, and can be changed or revoked only by mutual consent of all parties. The bill relies on existing definitions in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act for terms such as “affected Indian tribe,” “affected unit of local government,” “high-level radioactive waste,” and “repository,” and does not create new definitions.
The bill increases local and tribal control and creates enforceable community protections for repository siting, but at the cost of greater risk of delays, fragmented decision-making, and higher program and taxpayer costs.
State governments, local governments, and tribal governments gain formal, written, binding consent/cooperation agreements that give them effective consent authority and create enforceable, stable terms for repository cooperation (reducing unilateral changes).
Communities near proposed repository sites (local governments and tribal residents) gain negotiated protections for health, safety, the environment, and transportation because binding agreements require safety measures, route planning, and mitigation before siting proceeds.
Taxpayers and the federal nuclear waste program are likely to face delays in repository siting and higher overall program costs because expenditures and project steps could be blocked until all required agreements are reached.
Individual localities or tribes may be able to exercise de facto veto power, producing fragmented negotiations and uneven national nuclear waste policy that can prevent technically or nationally optimal siting decisions.
Longer, more complex agreement requirements will increase administrative and legal costs charged to the Nuclear Waste Fund and, indirectly, to taxpayers.
Introduced January 15, 2025 by Alice Costandina Titus · Last progress January 15, 2025