This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Prohibits the Secretary from spending money from the Nuclear Waste Fund on repository-related activities unless the Secretary has entered into a written, binding, and mutually amendable repository agreement with the state governor, each affected unit of local government, each contiguous local government along transport routes, and each affected Indian tribe. The bill adopts existing statutory definitions from the Nuclear Waste Policy Act for key terms like "affected Indian tribe," "affected unit of local government," "high-level radioactive waste," "repository," "Secretary," and "spent nuclear fuel."
The bill increases state, local, and tribal control and protects taxpayers by requiring enforceable pre-spending agreements and clearer statutory definitions, but does so at the likely cost of project delays, higher costs, reduced federal flexibility, and potential exclusion of some communities from protections.
Taxpayers are protected because federal repository work or spending cannot proceed until state, local, and tribal consent and terms are secured, reducing unilateral federal expenditures.
State and local governments gain enforceable, signed agreements that must be in place before federal repository activities proceed, giving them formal control over siting terms and conditions.
Affected Indian tribes obtain formal, binding agreements that protect tribal interests and require tribal consent before repository-related federal spending begins.
Repository development and related projects could be delayed, increasing overall program costs and prolonging storage at interim sites for utilities and communities.
Requiring binding, effectively unamendable agreements except by mutual consent could limit federal flexibility to adapt to new technical or safety information, slowing responsive action and complicating governance.
Giving contiguous or affected jurisdictions veto-like influence over transportation-related activities could complicate interstate or regional routing, increasing negotiation complexity and logistical hurdles.
Introduced January 15, 2025 by Catherine Marie Cortez Masto · Last progress January 15, 2025