Sponsors (10)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Abolishes the Department of Energy’s Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations and removes the federal statute that established it (42 U.S.C. §18861). The measure does not include a timeline, transition rules, fund transfers, or instructions for ongoing grants, contracts, or personnel. Because no implementation details are provided, the practical effects on DOE operations, current projects, staff, and external grantees are uncertain and would depend on follow-up administrative or legislative actions.
The bill cuts federal statutory obligations and ends a federal office to reduce federal spending and bureaucracy and give more local flexibility, but does so at the cost of slowing clean‑energy demonstrations and grid modernization, delaying environmental and public‑health benefits, shifting costs and risks to states, localities, utilities and taxpayers, and creating administrative uncertainty.
Taxpayers: Removing the statutory provision and terminating the Office reduces federal statutory obligations and could lower future federal spending tied to those programs.
State and local governments and private project partners: Eliminating the federal office or federal mandates can increase local control and flexibility to design and fund projects without a one‑size‑fits‑all federal approach.
General government/administration: Terminating the Office reduces federal bureaucracy and may simplify administrative processes or eliminate duplicative federal oversight.
Consumers, businesses, utilities, and communities: Reduced federal clean‑energy programs and demonstration projects will slow commercialization and adoption of new energy technologies, delaying consumer and business cost savings and market benefits.
Utilities, communities, and project partners: Terminating the Office and cutting federal coordination will slow grid modernization and resilience demonstration pilots, delaying reliability improvements and renewable integration.
Urban and rural communities and public health: Slower progress on emissions‑reducing technologies will delay environmental and health benefits (e.g., cleaner air), prolonging exposure to pollution.
Introduced June 26, 2025 by Brandon Gill · Last progress June 26, 2025