Sponsors
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a new Office of Management and Budget (OMB) official—called the Director of Improper Payment Mitigation or “Overpayment Czar”—to coordinate prevention, detection, and mitigation of improper federal payments and fraud. Requires executive agencies to include plans to reduce improper payments in their financial management plans, strengthens program review and reporting for programs at risk of improper payments, mandates States to use OMB payment-integrity tools and report on their use, and authorizes sequestration-style reductions to agency administrative accounts for persistent noncompliance. Implements new identification thresholds for newly created federal programs that could be susceptible to significant improper payments, expands data reporting for certain benefits (including TANF), tightens fraud-reporting and Do Not Pay data-sharing rules, and phases in a one-year delayed effective date for the new State reporting requirement. The changes increase oversight and reporting requirements for federal agencies and many States, and create a central OMB role to coordinate corrective actions and policy recommendations.
The bill aims to tighten payment integrity and recover taxpayer dollars by requiring agency and state action and enforcing compliance, but it imposes new administrative costs, compliance burdens, possible service delays, and privacy risks that could harm beneficiaries and strain state and agency capacity.
Taxpayers: The bill strengthens oversight and requires agencies to identify and reduce improper payments, likely lowering waste and recovering misspent federal funds.
Federal agencies and staff: Making payment-reduction planning and monitoring a required part of financial-management plans improves internal financial controls and accountability across the executive branch.
Low-income individuals and state governments: Requiring states to use OMB payment-integrity tools and report annually should reduce overpayments in programs like TANF, SNAP, Medicaid, WIC, and unemployment, protecting program dollars.
Beneficiaries and contractors: Efforts to reduce improper payments could tighten eligibility or payment processes and cause short-term disruptions or delays in legitimate payments if implemented too aggressively.
Federal employees and taxpayers: Agencies will incur compliance costs—staff time and resources—to develop, implement, and maintain improper-payment reduction plans and reporting.
Agencies, taxpayers, and local governments: Sequestration-based cuts (5–10%) to agency administrative accounts for noncompliance could reduce agency capacity to administer programs and delay services or oversight.
Introduced February 24, 2025 by Dan Meuser · Last progress February 24, 2025