Sponsors (2)
The bill increases transparency and supplies standardized data to support accountability and reform in large jurisdictions, but does so at the cost of new reporting burdens, substantial funding penalties, privacy risks, and incentives that could pressure prosecutors to pursue weaker cases.
Residents in jurisdictions of 100,000+ (and policymakers) gain public access to standardized prosecutorial data—covering charging, declination, bail, plea, and sentencing—improving transparency and giving elected officials and analysts consistent inputs to identify and target inequities.
Victims and advocacy groups (especially survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence) gain clearer explanations for case declinations and dismissals, improving accountability and allowing advocates to push for changes in how covered offenses are handled.
Communities and public-safety officials can use new tracking of pretrial failures (failures to appear, rearrests) and detention counts to refine release policies, which could reduce pretrial risk and improve public safety outcomes.
Defendants and community members risk more wrongful or marginal prosecutions because conditioning grant funding on filing rates (penalizing offices that decline prosecution for many referrals) may pressure prosecutors to charge weak cases.
Local and state prosecutor offices face the prospect of losing 25–50% of certain grant funding for failing to report, which could reduce resources for crime-prevention programs and other community services across affected jurisdictions.
Detailed public reporting of individual-level prior-contact indicators (arrest/conviction history, probation/parole status, sex-offender registry flags) creates privacy and re-identification risks for people with criminal histories or related records.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires chief prosecutors in jurisdictions of 100,000+ receiving specified Part T funds to report annual, detailed prosecutorial case and sentencing data to DOJ for publication and Congressional review; noncompliance can trigger partial grant withholding.
Introduced January 8, 2026 by Nancy Mace · Last progress January 8, 2026
Requires chief prosecuting officers in jurisdictions of 100,000+ that receive specified federal crime-prevention grant funds to submit an annual, detailed report about prosecutions, declinations, pretrial decisions, pleas, trials, and sentences for the prior fiscal year. The Attorney General must set uniform standards, publish the data, and send it to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. Offices that fail to report can lose 25–50% of their grant funds; additional corrective-plan and grant-eligibility penalties apply for other noncompliance, including for offices that decline to prosecute a high share of covered-offense referrals.