Sponsors (2)
The bill increases transparency and data-driven oversight of prosecutors to support accountability and pretrial reform, but it raises substantial privacy risks for victims, administrative and financial burdens on local offices, and a risk of perverse incentives that could increase prosecutions of weak cases.
Victims-survivors (especially of sexual and domestic violence) will gain clearer transparency into prosecutorial decisions because the Attorney General will publish data showing referrals, declinations, plea offers, bail and sentencing patterns.
Defendants—particularly low-income individuals—could benefit from data on bail requests, non-monetary conditions, and pretrial outcomes that supports reforms to reduce unnecessary pretrial detention and failures to appear.
State and local prosecutor offices will face stronger financial incentives to improve reporting and prosecutorial accountability because up to 25–50% of certain federal grant funds can be withheld for failing to report.
Victims-survivors risk privacy harms because publishing detailed, case-level prosecutorial data could enable reidentification or retraumatization, especially in sensitive sex-abuse cases.
Defendants (including people with disabilities) could face increased risk of being prosecuted in weak or inappropriate cases because the threat of grant reductions for declining to prosecute many referrals may create pressure to pursue more charges.
Small local prosecutor offices and local governments could suffer budgetary strain if they lose 25–50% of federal grant funding for noncompliance, reducing resources for public-safety programs.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Introduced January 8, 2026 by Nancy Mace · Last progress January 8, 2026
Requires chief prosecutors in jurisdictions of 100,000+ that receive certain DOJ grants to submit yearly, standardized reports to the Attorney General with detailed counts and breakdowns for a long list of sexual and related offenses (referrals, declinations, bail, plea and trial outcomes, sentencing, defendant prior history, etc.). The Attorney General must set uniform forms and publish collected data publicly; offices that fail to report can lose 25%–50% of grant funds and may face corrective actions or temporary loss of future grant eligibility if they decline to prosecute a high share of referred cases or repeatedly do not comply.