Sponsor
Brendan Francis Boyle
Representative · D-PA
Representative · D-PA
The bill restores the prior legal framework and avoids new spending or regulatory changes, at the cost of reversing benefits some people expected and creating administrative and potential fiscal downsides.
Taxpayers, small businesses, financial institutions, and state governments: the bill restores the prior legal framework and removes newly imposed rules, reducing regulatory uncertainty for entities that relied on pre-enactment law.
Taxpayers: the bill prevents any new spending or revenue changes created by the chapter from taking effect, avoiding associated implementation costs and short-term budget impacts.
Middle-class families and taxpayers who were expecting benefits or changes from the chapter: will lose those benefits or the anticipated changes when the chapter is repealed.
Taxpayers: repealing any revenue-raising provisions in the chapter could increase the federal deficit or require budget offsets elsewhere.
Federal and state agencies and employees: unwinding actions taken under the now-repealed chapter could create administrative costs and confusion during implementation.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Repeals a specified chapter of the reconciliation law and restores affected statutes to their pre-enactment text as if that chapter never existed.
Official title: To repeal the Medicaid-related portions of An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
Introduced July 9, 2026 by Brendan Francis Boyle · Last progress July 9, 2026
Repeals a specific chapter of the 2025–2026 reconciliation law and restores any federal statutes that that chapter changed to their text as they stood before the chapter was enacted. The effect is to erase the legal changes made by that chapter as if it had never been part of the reconciliation law. The bill is short and procedural: it names the Act and directs that the identified chapter be repealed with all amendments reversed, returning affected statutes to their pre-enactment wording. It does not itself specify replacement policy, funding, or transition rules.