Sponsor
Brendan Francis Boyle
Representative · D-PA
Representative · D-PA
The bill trades reinstating the familiar pre‑existing legal and fiscal status quo — reducing new regulatory obligations and implementation costs for many — against cutting off any new benefits created by the repealed chapter and creating transitional administrative burdens and possible fiscal impacts.
Taxpayers, small-business owners, financial institutions, and state governments: the bill restores the pre‑enactment legal framework and removes any new rules from the repealed chapter, reducing regulatory uncertainty and undoing unfamiliar compliance requirements.
Taxpayers: the bill prevents new spending or revenue changes created by the repealed chapter from taking effect, avoiding associated implementation costs and any immediate new fiscal burdens.
Middle‑class families and other people expecting benefits: anyone who was relying on new benefits or changes created by the repealed chapter will lose those anticipated benefits or program changes.
Taxpayers: if the repealed chapter had revenue‑raising provisions, removing them could worsen the deficit or require offsets elsewhere, potentially meaning future tax increases or spending cuts.
Federal employees, state governments, and courts: agencies and judicial bodies may face administrative costs and confusion as they unwind actions taken under the repealed chapter, creating transitional burdens and potential litigation.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Repeals a chapter of a prior reconciliation law and restores the affected statutes to their pre-enactment text.
Official title: To repeal the Medicaid-related portions of An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
Introduced July 9, 2026 by Brendan Francis Boyle · Last progress July 9, 2026
Repeals a specific chapter of a prior budget reconciliation law and restores the affected statutes to their text as they were before that chapter was enacted. In practice, it undoes changes made by that chapter to health-related law so those provisions read as if the chapter had never been enacted.