Sponsors (9)
The bill seeks to support domestic natural gas production and energy security—potentially lowering prices and boosting the industry—but does so at the risk of higher energy and operating costs for low-income households, farmers, and local economies and may undermine incentives for further methane emissions reductions.
Middle-class families and consumers would benefit from increased domestic natural gas production that can reduce reliance on foreign suppliers and help stabilize retail energy prices.
Utilities, energy companies, and natural-gas producing regions could see sustained demand, investment, and economic activity if policy treats natural gas as a transitional or favored fuel.
Taxpayers and households could gain national security benefits from reduced dependence on adversary energy suppliers and expanded U.S. LNG exports to allies.
Low-income and fixed-income households could face higher energy bills if methane fees or a natural gas tax pass through to retail prices.
Natural gas producing regions and related supply-chain businesses could be economically harmed—reducing local employment and shrinking tax bases—if fees or taxes make production less competitive.
Farmers and small businesses that rely on natural gas for inputs or heating could face higher operating costs, squeezing margins for agricultural producers and small enterprises.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Introduced January 23, 2025 by Troy Balderson · Last progress January 23, 2025
Expresses formal disagreement with the methane emissions fee created in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, arguing the fee (or a natural gas tax) is regressive, will raise costs for consumers and businesses, and will disproportionately harm natural gas producing regions and companies across the supply chain. The text cites data and international actions to claim that expanded domestic natural gas use and LNG exports improve energy security, lower some prices abroad, and have supported U.S. emissions reductions while natural gas production rose. The resolution is declarative and does not change law or create new programs; it frames economic, environmental, and national-security arguments against the methane fee and highlights U.S. natural gas resource estimates and international market dynamics.