Sponsors (3)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Eliminates the legal theory of disparate-impact liability in federal employment and housing civil-rights law and voids certain prior regulatory approvals tied to disparate-impact enforcement. Specifically, it replaces the disparate-impact provision in Title VII (employment) and adds a bar on disparate-impact claims under the Fair Housing Act, while defining “disparate impact” for purposes of those prohibitions. The bill also declares specified Presidential approvals of EEOC and DOJ regulations related to disparate-impact enforcement to have no force or effect. The measure does not appropriate funds or create new programs; it changes statutory liability standards and removes a basis for many existing civil-rights lawsuits and agency enforcement actions.
The bill reduces regulatory and litigation burdens for employers and courts by narrowing or eliminating disparate-impact liability and voiding certain agency approvals, but in doing so it substantially limits federal tools to challenge systemic discrimination, leaving vulnerable groups with fewer remedies and shifting enforcement burdens and potential costs to states, taxpayers, and affected communities.
Employers (including small businesses and federal contractors) face fewer lawsuits and regulatory obligations, lowering legal and compliance costs for businesses.
The bill clarifies the statutory meaning of "disparate impact" and reduces reliance on decades-old agency interpretations, providing a clearer textual standard for courts and regulated entities.
Courts and taxpayers may experience a lower litigation burden and fewer complex statistical disparate-impact cases to adjudicate, potentially reducing judicial and litigation costs.
Workers and residents in protected groups (racial and ethnic minorities, women, people with disabilities) lose an important avenue—the disparate-impact theory—to challenge practices that disproportionately harm them.
The bill substantially weakens federal civil-rights enforcement tools across employment, housing, and lending, reducing accountability for systemic discrimination.
Low-income renters and people with disabilities are more likely to face continued exclusion from housing by facially neutral policies without disparate-impact remedies, worsening access to housing and related social-service needs.
Introduced July 17, 2025 by Mike Lee · Last progress July 17, 2025