This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Changes admissions at the U.S. service academies to a single, uniformly calculated "candidate composite score" that emphasizes academics and standardized tests, limits subjective adjustments, and bans consideration of race, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. Each academy must rank candidates and alternates by that score and adopt numeric caps as "up to" amounts applied in score order. Requires each academy to appoint 300 alternates each year from nominated but non-selected candidates in rank order, and mandates detailed annual reporting to congressional defense committees on scores, waivers, waiver recipients' status and conduct, additional-appointee selections, and non-selected high-scoring candidates. Applies to the Military, Naval, and Air Force Academies and makes conforming edits to the referenced statutes.
The bill makes service academy admissions more standardized, accountable, and administratively ready (more alternates, transparent composite scores, limits on subjective adjustments) at the cost of restricting affirmative-consideration tools, increasing reliance on standardized academics, and raising privacy and flexibility concerns that could reduce diversity and disadvantage applicants from under-resourced backgrounds.
Applicants to the service academies will be evaluated by a uniform, transparent candidate composite score, making admissions decisions more consistent and predictable for students and nominees.
Limiting subjective adjustments to at most 10% (and capping subjective components at 10%) reduces discretionary bias in admissions decisions, benefiting applicants by making outcomes less dependent on individual selectors' judgments.
Each service secretary must appoint up to 300 ranked alternates annually, increasing the pool of ready candidates and reducing last-minute vacancies that can disrupt service academy classes and military staffing.
Applicants can no longer be considered on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or religion, which removes affirmative-consideration tools and risks reducing demographic diversity in the officer pipeline.
The admissions system requires heavy weight on standardized test scores (at least 45% of the overall score) and an academic component of at least 60%, which may disadvantage applicants from under-resourced schools and reduce holistic review.
Detailed four-year reporting on waivers, conduct, GPA, and departures for individual cadets/midshipmen raises student privacy concerns and could expose sensitive disciplinary information.
Introduced August 26, 2025 by Nancy Mace · Last progress August 26, 2025