This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires health-care employers and related entities that use AI clinical decision support systems (AI/CDSS) to let licensed health care professionals override AI recommendations and forbids retaliation for doing so. It forces covered entities to notify staff about AI use, provide training, create oversight committees, protect clinician identity in override data, and adopt policies that preserve independent clinical judgment. Creates federal enforcement paths: HHS (through OCR) enforces privacy/notice/policy requirements and may impose civil monetary penalties; the Department of Labor enforces anti-retaliation and recordkeeping rules, with investigatory power, civil penalties, and a private right of action for harmed clinicians. The law preserves malpractice liability for clinical decisions and does not preempt state law or collective bargaining agreements.
The bill strengthens clinician authority, worker protections, and multi-level oversight for AI clinical decision support but does so at the cost of substantial compliance, privacy, and litigation risks for providers and payers that could increase healthcare administrative burdens and affect care delivery.
Health care professionals (doctors, nurses, prior-authorization staff) keep final clinical decision authority and are protected from adverse employment actions or retaliation for overriding AI/CDSS, with new private remedies and enforcement paths if protections are violated.
The bill creates clearer definitions, oversight structures, and enforcement channels (HHS/OCR, Labor Department, agency consultations) for AI clinical decision support, enabling more consistent regulation and accountability of AI/CDSS in clinical settings.
Mandated clinician training on AI/CDSS use, limitations, inputs, and override procedures plus worker representation on AI/CDSS committees should improve safe, informed use and encourage reporting of unsafe AI practices.
Hospitals, health systems, insurers, and other covered entities will face substantial new compliance, reporting, recordkeeping, and administrative costs to implement policies, training, committees, and override-data reporting requirements.
Collecting, storing, and linking override data to identifiable clinicians creates privacy and reputational risks for health care professionals and may enable intensified monitoring of individual providers.
The combination of a robust private right of action, civil monetary penalties (including adapted 1128A procedures), high statutory damages (up to $100,000 per violation), and annual inflation adjustments exposes providers and states to large litigation and financial liabilities.
Introduced October 9, 2025 by Edward John Markey · Last progress October 9, 2025