Ask me to break this bill down.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Authorizes USDA officials, working with the U.S. Trade Representative, to negotiate agreements with foreign governments (including regionalization, zoning, and compartmentalization arrangements) to limit the disruption to U.S. animal-product exports when animal disease outbreaks occur. Negotiations must take into account accepted global research advances so that modern, science-based approaches guide export-market engagement. The change amends existing animal health law to create a clear, authorized pathway for federal negotiators to pursue targeted trade arrangements intended to preserve market access and reduce the export impact of animal disease events; no new funding or implementation deadlines are specified.
Redesignate existing subsection (d) of Section 10405 of the Animal Health Protection Act as subsection (e).
Insert a new subsection (d) titled “Engagement with export markets” after subsection (c) in Section 10405 of the Animal Health Protection Act.
Authorize the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the Under Secretary of Agriculture for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs, and the Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), and in consultation with the United States Trade Representative (USTR), to negotiate regionalization, zoning, compartmentalization, and other agreements with foreign governments regarding outbreaks of known animal disease threats that are of trade significance.
Direct that a negotiation carried out under the authorization should take into account accepted global research advances.
Clarify that nothing in this section limits the ability of the United States Trade Representative to negotiate trade agreements.
Primary impacts fall on the animal agriculture and trade sectors. Livestock and poultry producers, meat and dairy processors, and exporters could face fewer blanket trade suspensions during disease outbreaks because foreign governments could agree to limit restrictions to affected zones or biosecure compartments. USDA and USTR will have an explicit statutory mandate to negotiate these arrangements and to consider current scientific evidence, which may speed trade-reopening and reduce export losses. State animal health agencies and industry certification programs may be more involved as foreign governments typically require evidence of surveillance, testing, and biosecurity; coordination needs could increase between federal, state, and private actors. The provision does not create new funding or compensation mechanisms and therefore may require USDA/USTR to absorb negotiation-related administrative costs within existing budgets. Internationally, negotiating partners may raise technical or diplomatic issues; outcomes will depend on bilateral/multilateral willingness to accept regionalization/compartmentalization approaches and on the availability of accepted scientific evidence to support those arrangements.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Introduced April 28, 2025 by Roger F. Wicker · Last progress April 28, 2025
SAFE Act of 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Introduced in Senate