Sponsors (2)
The bill forces a fast, focused review of whether LPTA procurements pose national-security risks—improving oversight and enabling safer buying decisions, at the cost of OMB workload and potential higher contractor costs and slower acquisitions for public programs.
Federal agencies and congressional oversight committees will receive a documented assessment within 180 days identifying whether Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement poses national-security risks, improving timely oversight and visibility.
Federal agencies (and thus taxpayers) can change procurement practices if risks are identified, allowing sensitive acquisitions to move away from LPTA and strengthening national security protections.
OMB staff and other federal employees must divert time and resources to produce the review and report within 180 days, increasing workload and straining agency capacity.
Small businesses and contractors used to winning lowest‑price awards could face higher costs, new requirements, or reduced competitiveness if procurement policies change away from LPTA.
Taxpayers and program beneficiaries could see slower acquisition timelines and delayed public programs if the report prompts more restrictive procurement policies.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Introduced January 31, 2025 by Byron Donalds · Last progress March 4, 2025
Requires the OMB Director to review how Defense and civilian federal agencies use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement method and to determine whether that practice creates any national security risk. The Director must report the review findings to two congressional committees within 180 days of enactment.