Who is affected and how:

• EPA: The agency is the direct implementer. The amendment alters the statutory authority EPA uses for programs tackling plastic waste; EPA will need to interpret and implement any new language once available.

• State, Tribal, and local governments: Entities that apply for or receive EPA grants or technical assistance for plastic pollution prevention, cleanup, or recycling programs could see continued or revised eligibility and program terms depending on the new text.

• Waste management and recycling operators (including publicly owned treatment works): Organizations that manage plastic waste or run recycling and treatment operations could be affected by changes in funding priorities, grant eligibility, reporting, or technical requirements.

• Environmental justice and impacted communities: Local communities affected by plastic pollution may benefit if reauthorization continues or expands programs for cleanup, prevention, or community assistance; outcomes depend on the substance of the new provisions.

• Manufacturers and producers of plastic products (industry): Potentially affected if the revised authority changes program focus toward upstream measures (e.g., waste reduction, producer responsibility) but the excerpt gives no direct indication of such shifts.

Overall impact: The amendment is procedural/authorization-focused in form. Real-world impacts depend entirely on the content of the inserted and replacement text and any appropriations that follow. Because those details are not in the provided excerpt, immediate effects and fiscal consequences are uncertain. If the changes preserve or strengthen EPA program authority, affected parties may see continuity or expansion of grants, technical assistance, and regulatory guidance; if the changes narrow authority, some programs or activities could be reduced or re-scoped.