Summary

Amends the Administrative Procedure Act’s judicial-review provision (5 U.S.C. §706) by reorganizing and changing specific wording in the statute that governs how courts review federal agency actions. The edits add and relabel subsection markers, remove a clause that described courts’ role in deciding legal questions and interpreting constitutional and statutory provisions, and insert unspecified new text after an existing phrase; no new funding or deadlines are included. The change is technical in form but could affect how much authority courts exercise over agency decisions and how judicial review is structured. Because the text to be added is not shown, the practical effect is uncertain and will depend on the content of the inserted language and how courts interpret the revised statute.

• Modifies 5 U.S.C. §706 — the Administrative Procedure Act provision that governs judicial review of agency actions.
• Adds and relabels subsection markers to reorganize the statute’s structure.
• Deletes an explicit clause saying courts ‘decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions,’ which may change how courts describe or exercise review authority.
• Inserts unspecified new text after an existing phrase, so the full effect depends on that content.
• Does not provide funding, create deadlines, or change other statutory citations.
• Primarily a textual and structural amendment rather than a programmatic or spending bill.
• Could prompt litigation and higher-court clarification because judicial-review rules are central to administrative law.
• Effects on agencies, regulated parties, and courts hinge on how courts read the revised language in practice.