Ask me why this bill matters.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates the Shenandoah Mountain National Scenic Area on about 92,562 acres of National Forest System land in Virginia, directs the Forest Service to manage the area for conservation and recreation, and withdraws those federal lands from many types of development while preserving private land access. The bill also adds five wilderness designations (or additions) in the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to file official maps and boundary descriptions with Congress and make them available to the public.
“National Scenic Area” means the Shenandoah Mountain National Scenic Area established by section 3(a).
The term “National Scenic Area” includes any National Forest System land within the boundary of the National Scenic Area that is administered as part of the National Scenic Area.
The term “National Scenic Area” also includes any National Forest System land within the boundary of the National Scenic Area that is administered as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System under the amendments made by section 4.
“Secretary” means the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.
“State” means the State of Virginia.
Adds five new wilderness area entries to 16 U.S.C. 1132—(21) Skidmore Fork Wilderness (approx. 5,088 acres); (22) Ramseys Draft wilderness addition (approx. 6,961 acres) to be incorporated into the Ramseys Draft Wilderness; (23) Lynn Hollow Wilderness (approx. 3,568 acres); (24) Little River Wilderness (approx. 12,461 acres); and (25) Beech Lick Knob Wilderness (approx. 5,779 acres)—each referencing maps filed under section 5(a)(2) of the Act.
Who is affected and how:
Visitors to federal public recreational sites (relevance: 1.0): Hikers, campers, anglers, hunters, and other outdoor users will see expanded protections, likely improved recreation standards, and limits on development that could change trail and access management.
Local communities (relevance: 0.9): Towns and counties near the designated area may experience effects on local land use, economic activity, and recreation-based tourism; restrictions on logging, mining, and new development can reduce some extractive economic activity while potentially boosting recreation and tourism opportunities.
Tourism industry and outdoor recreation businesses (relevance: 0.7): Outfitters, guide services, lodging, and other recreation-dependent businesses could benefit from increased visitation and enhanced landscape protections, but businesses tied to timber or mineral extraction may face reduced federal opportunities.
Local governments (relevance: 0.6): County and municipal governments will interact with the Forest Service on access, emergency response, infrastructure near the boundary, and local economic development; the Act preserves private access rights, which reduces direct burdens on localities.
Private landowners and adjacent residents (proposed population) (relevance: 1.0): Private property owners inside or next to the scenic area retain ownership and access under the Act, but nearby landowners may face stricter federal land-use rules on adjacent public lands that can affect viewsheds, access routes, or permitted uses.
Federal land managers and the Forest Service (relevance: 1.0): The Secretary/Forest Service takes on planning, management, reporting, mapping, and implementation duties with defined timelines and legal obligations; these tasks require staff time and administrative action.
Broader effects:
Conservation outcomes: The designation provides stronger statutory protection for natural, scenic, and cultural resources and creates new Wilderness protections that limit mechanized use and commercial resource extraction.
Economic trade-offs: Limits on new development and extractive uses reduce federal leasing and development opportunities on the designated lands, while potentially increasing recreation and tourism-related economic activity in adjacent communities.
Legal clarity: Requiring official maps with statutory force reduces boundary and acreage disputes, but may force adjustments where on-the-ground conditions differ from map figures.
Fiscal impact: The Act imposes planning and administrative duties on the Forest Service but does not itself appear to appropriate major new funding; implementation may rely on existing agency budgets or future appropriations.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Introduced May 8, 2025 by Timothy Michael Kaine · Last progress May 8, 2025
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 214.
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Reported by Senator Boozman without amendment. Without written report.
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.