Sponsors (15)
I'll give you the short version of this bill.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a new federal crime for knowingly distributing intimate visual images that were taken where the subject reasonably expected privacy, were not voluntarily exposed in public, and are not a matter of public concern when the distributor intends or causes harm; it also outlaws knowingly distributing nude images of minors with harmful or sexual intent. The law sets criminal penalties (prison, fines), allows forfeiture and restitution, includes exceptions for law enforcement, reporting, medical/educational uses, certain service providers, and applies extraterritorial jurisdiction in specified circumstances.
Defines “communications service” to include: (A) a common carrier (as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153) when acting as a common carrier; (B) an electronic communication service (as defined in 2510); (C) an information service (as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153); and (D) an interactive computer service (as defined in 47 U.S.C. 230(f)).
Adopts the term “information content provider” with the meaning given in section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934.
Defines “intimate visual depiction” as any visual depiction (per section 2256(5)) of an individual who: (A) was 18 or older when the depiction was created; (B) is recognizable to a third party from the image or associated text; and (C) (i) is depicted engaging in sexually explicit conduct, or (ii) has unclothed and visible genitals, anus, pubic area, or female nipple.
Defines “minor” by reference to the meaning in section 2256.
Defines “sexually explicit conduct” by reference to section 2256(2)(A).
Who is affected and how:
Victims (adults): People whose private intimate images are distributed without consent will gain a federal criminal cause of action, potential restitution, and forfeiture remedies. The law targets conduct intended to harm or that causes harm and is meant to improve accountability and victim recovery.
Minors: The statute separately criminalizes distribution of nude images of minors when done with harmful or sexual intent, adding federal protection for child-image exploitation and enabling federal prosecutions in appropriate cases.
Perpetrators/distributors: Individuals who knowingly distribute qualifying intimate images face federal criminal charges, fines, and possible imprisonment. The knowledge/intent standards mean prosecutors must show the distributor knew the private nature of the image and intended or caused harm (or acted recklessly).
Online platforms and intermediaries: Platforms that host, transmit, or publish user images may face increased takedown, notice, and compliance pressure even if direct liability is limited by exceptions for certain service-provider activities. Platforms will need policies and processes to identify prohibited content, respond to lawful takedown requests, and coordinate with law enforcement while protecting speech exceptions.
Law enforcement and prosecutors: Federal law-enforcement agencies gain a new tool to investigate and prosecute image-based abuse, including cases with interstate or international elements because of the statute’s extraterritorial hooks. That will require investigative resources and coordination with state authorities.
Medical, educational, and journalistic actors: Explicit exceptions protect bona fide medical care, education, and many reporting/public‑interest activities from prosecution, but these actors may still need to document legitimate uses to avoid disputes.
Practical considerations and tradeoffs:
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced February 11, 2025 by Jefferson Van Drew · Last progress February 11, 2025
SHIELD Act of 2023
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House