The bill would produce more accurate poverty measures and stronger program oversight, but it also increases data‑sharing and administrative burdens, raises privacy risks, and tightens SNAP rules in ways that could reduce access and increase hardship for some low‑income households.
Low-income individuals and policymakers will get more accurate, alternative poverty measures and clearer estimates of federal benefits' anti‑poverty effects, improving targeting and program design.
Respondents will have stronger legal confidentiality protections and criminal penalties for unlawful disclosures, which should increase privacy safeguards and may improve survey participation.
SNAP program integrity may improve because recovered funds will more often fund fraud investigations and abusive retailers can be permanently barred, potentially protecting program resources for eligible households.
Many low-income households (including parents and children) face higher risk of benefit delays, loss, or stricter sanctions due to new deeming, tighter work/cooperation rules, limits on authorized EBT users, and narrower definitions of allowable food purchases.
Rising state matching requirements (up to 50% by FY2033) will increase fiscal pressure on state budgets and could force reductions in SNAP administrative services or program access.
Providing detailed tax and benefits data to the Census, even with safeguards, raises the risk of re‑identification or breaches that could expose sensitive financial information for taxpayers and low‑income respondents.
Based on analysis of 5 sections of legislative text.
Introduced March 27, 2025 by Mike Lee · Last progress March 27, 2025
Requires the Census Bureau and Federal agencies to share administrative and tax data beginning FY2025 to create improved poverty measures and to measure the anti‑poverty effects of Federal benefit programs, while adding confidentiality protections and criminal penalties for unlawful disclosure. Substantially changes SNAP rules by tightening eligibility and work requirements, narrowing the statutory definition of allowable “food,” increasing state cost‑sharing for administration over time, strengthening vendor oversight and penalties for trafficking, adding cooperation requirements with fraud investigations, limiting authorized EBT users, and directing new reporting on SNAP employment and training outcomes.