The bill speeds and lowers the cost of geothermal development at certain previously disturbed sites—potentially boosting low‑carbon energy and jobs—but does so by limiting NEPA review, which raises risks of overlooked local environmental harms and reduced public input.
Utilities and energy developers can begin geothermal drilling sooner and face lower permitting time and costs for projects at recently drilled locations or within recently approved developed fields.
Rural communities and the energy sector may see faster deployment of low‑carbon geothermal power, supporting cleaner electricity generation and potential local jobs and economic activity.
Nearby residents and communities may face fewer environmental and public‑health safeguards because some geothermal drilling could avoid full NEPA review, increasing short‑term risks to local wellbeing.
Local communities and governments risk site‑specific harms (e.g., increased water use, induced seismicity, subsurface contamination) because streamlined review could overlook localized environmental impacts.
Local governments and residents may have reduced opportunities for public input and less transparency on drilling approvals when full NEPA processes are bypassed.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Adds geothermal to the energy activities that receive a rebuttable presumption of categorical exclusion under NEPA for certain follow-up drilling and developed-field drilling within a five-year window.
Introduced February 6, 2025 by Catherine Marie Cortez Masto · Last progress February 6, 2025
Adds geothermal energy to the list of energy activities that receive a rebuttable presumption in favor of categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when certain limited drilling activities occur. Specifically, it treats geothermal drilling at a previously drilled location within five years, and drilling within a developed field analyzed or approved in the last five years, the same as oil and gas for purposes of that presumption.