Sponsors
The bill would push platforms to moderate more — potentially reducing online harms — but does so by greatly increasing liability, which risks chilling lawful speech, raising costs, harming startups, and creating prolonged legal uncertainty.
Internet users (particularly children, parents, and middle-class families) may see platforms increase content moderation, potentially reducing online harms such as harassment and extremist content.
Creators and small businesses may gain clearer statutory rules about platform liability during the bill's sunset/replacement period, which could help planning and compliance.
Platform operators (and by extension their employees and users) will face much higher legal liability beginning Jan 1, 2027, raising moderation costs and legal risk for companies and users.
Many users (including parents, children, and general internet users) may lose access to lawful speech because platforms will preemptively remove or block content to avoid liability.
Smaller platforms and startups may be forced to shut down or be acquired due to disproportionate legal exposure, reducing competition and innovation in online services.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Removes the federal legal shield that currently protects online platforms from most lawsuits over third‑party content and moderation. The statute sets that protection to expire on December 31, 2026, so Section 230 would have no force or effect beginning January 1, 2027, exposing platforms and related actors to greater legal risk and regulatory uncertainty.
Introduced December 16, 2025 by Harriet Hageman · Last progress December 16, 2025