Sponsors (2)
The bill modestly expands preservation, public access, and educational programming around Dayton aviation history and may boost local tourism, at the cost of small additional federal management responsibilities and ongoing taxpayer-funded maintenance.
Visitors and Dayton-area residents gain access to roughly one additional acre of protected parkland, preserving aviation heritage and slightly expanding public recreational and interpretive space.
Schools, universities, and the public benefit because the National Park Service can manage and interpret an additional historic property, improving preservation and educational programming about aviation history.
Local communities near Dayton may see modest increases in tourism and related economic activity as the designation can attract visitors interested in aviation history.
Local governments (and potentially nearby landowners) may face new federal management obligations or land‑use restrictions on the added parcel, limiting development options.
U.S. taxpayers will incur modest ongoing maintenance and operating costs for the additional acreage placed under National Park Service care.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Statutorily expands the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park boundary to include about 1 acre shown as "Proposed Addition" on a Feb. 2023 map.
Official title: To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
Introduced July 23, 2025 by Michael R. Turner · Last progress July 23, 2025
Adds about one acre to the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park by incorporating a parcel shown as “Proposed Addition” on a park map dated February 2023. The new land is added in addition to the sites already included in the park’s existing statutory boundary descriptions. This is a narrow, site-specific change that expands the park’s authorized footprint to include a particular parcel in Dayton, Ohio. It does not change park purpose, create new programs, or authorize new federal spending beyond the boundary modification itself.