Sponsors (17)
The bill boosts individual expression and certain institutional autonomies in graduate medical education and clarifies accreditor limits, but links federal funding and accreditation to ideological‑compliance rules that could reduce DEI efforts, impose administrative burdens, and risk harms to underserved patients and affected students.
Students, faculty, and trainees at graduate medical schools keep protections against being compelled to make or endorse ideological pledges and retain broad First Amendment and academic-activity protections (guest lectures, student orgs).
The bill reaffirms that institutions must comply with federal civil‑rights laws (Titles IV, VI, IX, Section 504, Age Discrimination Act), preserving legal protections for covered students and trainees.
Accrediting agencies for graduate medical education must certify they will not impose policies that conflict with the bill, protecting program autonomy and making accreditation expectations more transparent.
Students, hospitals, and health systems risk losing federal funding and access to federally backed student loans if graduate medical schools with DEI offices or diversity-statement requirements are deemed noncompliant, threatening tuition aid and program viability.
Removing or curtailing DEI programs and related curricula could reduce efforts to address racial and ethnic health disparities in training, potentially harming patient care and workforce preparedness—especially for patients with chronic conditions and underserved communities.
New certification requirements and conditional funding create legal uncertainty and added administrative burden for institutions and accreditors, increasing compliance costs and potentially slowing accreditation and program decisions.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Introduced May 20, 2025 by Gregory Francis Murphy · Last progress May 20, 2025
Conditions federal funding and participation in federal student loan programs for graduate medical schools on submitting two certifications: one that the school will not require faculty, staff, or students to affirm certain specified ‘‘tenets’’ (including claims that individuals are oppressors/ oppressed because of race, sex, religion, etc.), will not take adverse educational actions based on race/ethnicity/color/national origin, will not require DEI curricular units or diversity statements, and will not maintain a DEI office; and a second that the school will follow federal civil‑rights laws and Department of Education rules. It also requires accrediting bodies that review graduate medical education to show they do not force institutions to adopt policies contrary to these certifications, clarifies that routine teaching, research, free expression, and religious tenets are preserved, and includes a severability rule.