The bill restores prior judicial review rules—strengthening independent oversight and legal predictability for challengers—but at the cost of increased litigation, slower agency action, and renewed regulatory uncertainty that could strain D.C. budgets and delay services for residents.
D.C. courts and administrative tribunals will review agency actions de novo more often, increasing independent judicial oversight and making it easier for challengers to obtain non‑deferential review.
Repealing the temporary amendment restores prior law, preserving established legal protections and predictability for parties who rely on those judicial standards.
The Mayor's office and D.C. agencies will likely face more litigation and higher legal costs as courts give less deference to agency interpretations, diverting resources from public programs and services.
Less deference to agency interpretations could slow administrative decision‑making and program implementation, delaying services and approvals residents and businesses rely on.
Reinstating the prior standard may recreate regulatory uncertainty for agencies and outside parties who adjusted to the temporary amendment, complicating planning and compliance.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Stops courts and administrative tribunals in D.C. from giving deference to Mayor or agency interpretations and repeals a 2024 temporary amendment, restoring prior law.
Introduced June 5, 2025 by Harriet Hageman · Last progress June 5, 2025
Prohibits courts and administrative tribunals in the District of Columbia from giving any deference to interpretations of statutes or regulations advanced by the Mayor or DC agencies when those interpretations are reviewed in judicial or administrative proceedings. It also repeals a recent temporary D.C. amendment passed in 2024, restoring the prior law as if that temporary amendment had never been enacted. The change narrows the legal advantage agencies and the Mayor sometimes obtain when courts evaluate agency orders, decisions, or rules, making judges and tribunals decide the meaning of statutes and regulations without deferring to the executive branch's view.