Sponsors (2)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Updates and broadens federal water power research and development programs. It directs expanded support for marine energy and hydropower manufacturing, testing, environmental studies, grid modeling, and workforce training, while increasing the total authorized funding to $300 million per year for fiscal years 2026–2030. The measure also tightens interagency coordination, adds new partners for workforce and research, requires public briefings on progress, and permits new demonstration uses such as hydrogen production, desalination, disaster recovery, aquaculture, and subsea/offshore power. The bill clarifies priorities for U.S.-based manufacturing of marine energy components, strengthens criteria and support for national marine energy centers, and revises program reporting from annual to biennial with public disclosure. Some provided allocation language for subcategories appears malformed or placeholder and would need correction to guide specific funding splits.
The bill directs federal investment to accelerate domestic marine energy and hydropower research, workforce development, and resilient infrastructure, trading increased taxpayer spending and the risk of higher project and regulatory costs for stronger domestic supply chains and accelerated deployment.
U.S. manufacturers and energy workers gain federal support to build domestic marine energy supply chains via university-industry collaborations, helping create jobs and strengthen domestic industry.
Rural communities and homeowners gain new resilience and energy options (desalination, disaster recovery support, microgrids, subsea/offshore power) from marine energy demonstration projects.
Students, researchers, and scientists receive expanded funding, R&D support, training, and fellowship opportunities in marine energy and hydropower, boosting workforce development and innovation.
Taxpayers face higher federal spending because the bill authorizes roughly $300 million per year, which could increase the deficit or require spending offsets.
Small businesses, project developers, and energy workers could see higher project costs if a fast push for U.S.-based manufacturing relies on less-mature domestic supply chains.
Local governments and utilities may encounter additional regulatory or environmental review for expanded demonstration activities (e.g., hydrogen, fuels, desalination, aquaculture), causing delays and higher compliance costs.
Introduced January 16, 2026 by Suzanne Bonamici · Last progress January 16, 2026