Water Preservation and Affordability Act of 2025 (HR-5661) · Congress.wiki

Water Preservation and Affordability Act of 2025 (HR-5661) · Congress.wiki

Pros & Cons

The bill directs targeted federal grants and mandates efficiency/resilience measures that will reduce water and energy use and improve community flood resilience while supporting local investment, but it raises planning costs and timelines, increases federal spending, and may leave smaller communities struggling to comply without additional support.

Potential Benefits

4

Local and state water utilities and the communities they serve will receive dedicated federal grants ($40M/yr for wastewater-efficiency grants and $50M/yr for resiliency/sustainability) to upgrade treatment works, improve efficiency, and increase resilience.
Infrastructure
local-governments, state-governments, utilities-energy-companies, urban-communities, rural-communities
Utilities and local governments will be required to evaluate and deploy resource-preservation and energy-efficient technologies, reducing water use and energy consumption at treatment works.
Environment
utilities-energy-companies, local-governments
Residents in urban and rural areas will benefit from stormwater mitigation and sustainable design measures that lower flood risk and improve community resilience.
Health & Safety
urban-communities, rural-communities

Potential Drawbacks

3

Smaller and rural communities may struggle to meet the bill's 'maximum extent practicable' standards without extra technical assistance or matching funds, risking inequitable outcomes or delayed projects.
Justice
rural-communities, small-business-owners, small municipal utilities
Utilities and municipalities may face higher planning costs and longer timelines because of new evaluation and resource-preservation requirements, delaying upgrades or increasing local expenses.
Economy
local-governments, state-governments, utilities-energy-companies
The new appropriations ($40M/yr and $50M/yr) increase federal spending and could contribute to budgetary pressures that are ultimately borne by taxpayers.
Government
taxpayers

Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.

Bill Summary

Summary

Designates an official short title for the Act and amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to define a new term, "resource preservation technique," covering water and energy efficiency, stormwater mitigation, sustainable planning/design/construction, and other environmentally innovative approaches. It requires consideration and, where loans are used for repair/expansion of treatment works, maximal practicable evaluation and use of these techniques in State Revolving Fund (SRF) and capitalization grant criteria, and it authorizes multi-year funding for wastewater efficiency grants and a resiliency/sustainability program. The bill directs $40 million per year for fiscal years 2026–2031 for wastewater efficiency grants and sets $50 million per year for fiscal years 2026–2031 for the Clean Water Infrastructure Resiliency and Sustainability Program, with the funds described as remaining available until expended.

Key Points

Click to see evidence