Sponsors (3)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced January 30, 2025 by Alejandro Padilla · Last progress January 30, 2025
Authorizes a Forest Service pilot to use up to $250 million in conservation finance agreements to leverage private and non‑Federal capital for large landscape ecological restoration projects on and adjacent to National Forest lands, sets cost‑share rules and reporting requirements, and limits single‑agreement obligations. Creates a DOE program to fund energy resilience projects for critical facilities and raises weatherization cost limits and adds fire‑resistant materials and wildfire planning requirements for assisted housing. Establishes Western prescribed‑fire centers and new grant programs for workforce development and community capacity, including a $50 million authorization for disadvantaged‑community stewardship grants and various training and research initiatives.
The bill directs significant federal support and new authorities to scale wildfire restoration, resilience, and workforce programs—leveraging private capital and improving community resilience—while increasing federal fiscal exposure and raising implementation, equity, scalability, and oversight risks that could limit or slow benefits.
Residents of fire-prone rural, tribal, and forest-adjacent communities will get prioritized large-scale ecological restoration on very large landscapes (≥100,000 acres), reducing wildfire risk and related property and ecosystem losses.
Hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, police and fire stations will gain more resilient on-site power (microgrids, renewables, storage), lowering outage risks for critical services during disasters.
Low-income households and assisted housing residents will be able to access higher-cost weatherization measures (including fire- and drought-resistant materials and deeper efficiency upgrades), improving safety and reducing utility bills over time.
All taxpayers face increased federal fiscal exposure from new authorizations and commitments (up to $250M pilot commitments plus $100M DOE and other authorizations), including potential large cancellation payments or added appropriations pressure.
Project developers, nonprofits, and investors face payment uncertainty because many program benefits depend on contingent future appropriations and reimbursement rules (minimum non‑Federal shares, limited interest reimbursement), which could deter investment or delay projects.
Program and grant caps (e.g., pilot limits of 20 agreements and $50M per agreement, $50,000 per stewardship grant, and administrative caps) may be too small to scale or fund truly large restoration work, limiting impact for many communities.