Congress.wikiCongress.wiki
Congress
MapWatchScheduleDaily RecordMembersCommitteesLegislationNominations
Money & Oversight
MoneyOffice SpendingSubpoenasHouse EthicsForeign InfluenceSpecial Rules
Executive & Law
AgenciesRegulationsUS Code

Without donations, we may shut down.Congress.wiki needs your support. Without donations, we may have to shut down the site.

Learn whyDonate
Search⌘K
Congress
MapWatchScheduleDaily RecordMembersCommitteesLegislationNominations
Money & Oversight
MoneyOffice SpendingSubpoenasHouse EthicsForeign InfluenceSpecial Rules
Executive & Law
AgenciesRegulationsUS Code

I can walk you through what this section actually means

U.S. Code/Title 15/§ 1067

Title 15

15

Title overviewSearch titleAll titles
15 U.S.C. § 1067.Chapter 22

§ 1067

Interference, opposition, and proceedings for concurrent use registration or for cancellation; notice; Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Title 15
2 min read
Subchapter: THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER

Need the full chapter outline? Open Chapter 22 to browse every section without loading the entire chapter explorer on this page.

Back to Chapter 22Previous: § 1066bNext: § 1068

((a)) In every case of interference, opposition to registration, application to register as a lawful concurrent user, or application to cancel the registration of a mark, the Director shall give notice to all parties and shall direct a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine and decide the respective rights of registration.

((b)) The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board shall include the Director, Deputy  Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office  the Commissioner for Patents, the Commissioner for Trademarks, and administrative trademark judges who are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director.

((c)) ** .—** The Secretary of Commerce may, in his or her discretion, deem the appointment of an administrative trademark judge who, before , held office pursuant to an appointment by the Director to take effect on the date on which the Director initially appointed the administrative trademark judge.

((d)) ** .—** It shall be a defense to a challenge to the appointment of an administrative trademark judge on the basis of the judge’s having been originally appointed by the Director that the administrative trademark judge so appointed was acting as a de facto officer.

§ 1066b

Release: pl-119-103 (2026-09-02)

§ 1068

Get a weekly summary of what Congress did, delivered every Sunday.

  • About
  • How Congress Works
  • Quiz
  • Congress Wrapped
  • Pricing
  • Roadmap
  • Health
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
WhiteHouse.wiki•SCOTUS.wiki
Congress.wiki Alpha
Support Us

This is not an official government website.

© 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.