Sponsors (32)
The resolution increases U.S. and allied deterrence, aid, and pressure on Russia—potentially improving security, protecting U.S. economic interests, and advancing accountability—but it likely raises taxpayer costs, increases risks of military entanglement, and could limit diplomatic flexibility.
U.S. and NATO populations would face a lower risk of broader military aggression because the bill strengthens U.S. and NATO deterrence against escalation.
Ukrainian civilians and communities would receive more sustained and predictable security support if the U.S. and allies commit guarantees, which can reduce human suffering and help stabilize the region.
U.S. companies and broader U.S. economic and security interests benefit from attention to economic pressure and targeted responses to attacks on U.S. firms, supporting sanctions and export controls that protect markets and competitiveness.
U.S. taxpayers could face higher federal spending because committing to sustained security guarantees and aid obligations would increase defense and foreign aid costs.
U.S. military personnel and their families could face greater risk and the United States could become more deeply entangled in the conflict if military support expands, raising chances of casualties or escalation.
U.S. diplomats and negotiators may have fewer diplomatic options because strong public condemnation and harsh findings against Russia could complicate efforts to negotiate ceasefires or settlements.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Records findings condemning Russia’s invasion and abuses, notes Ukrainian gains and Russia’s strains, and calls for sustained, predictable U.S. and allied security guarantees.
Introduced February 24, 2026 by Jeanne Shaheen · Last progress February 24, 2026
Affirms that Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, condemns Russian attacks on civilians and infrastructure, and cites alleged forcible transfer of thousands of Ukrainian children. Notes Russia’s prior annexation of Crimea and occupation in Donbas, describes reported Russian economic and military strains, highlights recent Ukrainian battlefield gains, and argues that sustained, predictable U.S. and allied security guarantees are required to deter further aggression. States that U.S. and international recognition of Ukraine’s sovereignty within its 1991 borders remains important, notes U.S. companies in Ukraine have been targeted, and observes that European partners have provided larger recent increases in military, economic, and humanitarian aid than the United States; the resolution is a statement of findings and policy direction rather than a funding or authorization measure.