Sponsors (7)
The bill improves public transparency and enables better enforcement analysis through a standardized, searchable enforcement database and annual reports, but does so while imposing implementation and compliance costs, raising privacy/due-process risks, and risking limited usefulness if historical data are incomplete.
Federal agencies, taxpayers, and the public gain a centralized, searchable database of corporate enforcement actions, making enforcement records more transparent and easier to find and review.
Companies, researchers, and regulators get standardized, linked enforcement data (including unique identifiers) that makes it easier to identify repeat offenders, detect patterns, and support accountability and evidence-based policymaking.
Taxpayers and investors benefit from annual reports (with Attorney General consultation) that can inform legislative or enforcement reforms to better protect consumers and investor interests.
Federal agencies and taxpayers will incur administrative and IT costs to collect, standardize, and publish the data, and private companies may face increased compliance costs to conform to reporting requirements.
Small businesses, companies, and named individuals risk reputational harm and privacy/due-process concerns from public listings tied to alleged offenses before legal resolution.
Researchers, regulators, and market participants may face biased or limited analysis because historical coverage of past enforcement actions could be incomplete or inconsistent.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires BJS to publish a public, searchable database of federal enforcement actions against business entities and to produce initial and annual analytical reports.
Requires the Bureau of Justice Statistics to create, publish, and maintain a public, searchable, downloadable online database of federal enforcement actions against business entities. Agencies that conduct or document federal enforcement actions must submit information under guidance issued within 180 days; the database must be published within one year and updated as new data arrive. The Director must also produce an initial congressional report within one year after publication and annual reports thereafter that analyze recidivism, estimate victim/public impacts, and include recommendations developed in consultation with the Attorney General. Also directs the Chief Data Officer Council to identify ways federal agencies can standardize, digitize, share, and publish information needed for the database. The measure focuses on data collection, public access, and regular reporting rather than creating new criminal penalties or altering substantive enforcement authority.
Introduced July 23, 2025 by Mary Gay Scanlon · Last progress July 23, 2025