Sponsors (12)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates and authorizes federally supported State judicial threat and intelligence resource centers run by qualified national nonprofits to help protect State and local judges and court staff. The centers would provide training, threat monitoring, physical security assessments, standardized incident reporting, a national database for threats, and coordination with federal, State, and local law enforcement. The State Justice Institute is authorized to give financial and technical support and must submit an annual report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on threats and their severity once a center is established.
The bill centralizes expertise, training, and threat reporting to better protect judges and courthouse staff, but it increases privacy risks, ongoing costs, and the chance that smaller jurisdictions or local organizations will be left behind or constrained.
State and local judges, court staff, and courthouse visitors will receive enhanced protection through access to national nonprofit expertise, targeted safety training, technical assistance, and physical-security assessments, reducing threats and harassment.
State and local law enforcement and court administrators will gain a national threat-reporting database plus standardized incident-reporting and threat-evaluation practices, improving information-sharing and enabling faster, more consistent threat mitigation.
State and local courthouses and justice partners will get expert guidance on courthouse design and security standards and clearer eligibility criteria for partner organizations, potentially reducing vulnerabilities and streamlining grant awards or partnerships.
Individuals' privacy and civil liberties may be endangered because centralized collection, sharing, and reporting of threat data could expose sensitive personal information or be used beyond original purposes.
Creating and operating threat centers, the national database, conducting assessments, and preparing mandated reports will require funding and administrative work, increasing costs for taxpayers and diverting staff/time from other services.
Adopting recommended design and security standards could impose substantial implementation and retrofit costs on state and local jurisdictions, disproportionately burdening smaller or rural communities.
Introduced July 22, 2025 by John Cornyn · Last progress November 20, 2025