Last progress June 11, 2025 (8 months ago)
Introduced on June 11, 2025 by Ruben Gallego
3 meetings related to this legislation
Requires the Comptroller General (GAO) to study how federal laws, programs, and rules help or hinder wildfire mitigation projects that cross boundaries between federal and non‑federal lands. The study must review existing programs, funding access and capacity for federal, state, local, and Tribal entities, and activities under subsection (e) of section 103 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act, and then report findings and recommendations to two Congressional committees within two years of enactment.
Comptroller General of the United States must conduct a study on issues related to wildfire mitigation across land ownership boundaries.
Study must identify existing Federal programs, rules, and authorities that enable or inhibit wildfire mitigation across Federal and non-Federal land ownership boundaries.
Study must evaluate whether changes to any program, rule, or authority would allow Federal land management agencies, the Secretary of Agriculture (through the Chief of NRCS), the Secretary of Homeland Security (through the FEMA Administrator), the U.S. Fire Administration, States, local governments, and Tribal governments increased capacity or access to funding to mitigate wildfires.
Study must examine activities carried out under subsection (e) of section 103 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003, including how to improve their effectiveness at mitigating wildfire.
Study must examine whether enactment of subsection (e) of section 103 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act has increased the access of Federal land management agencies and States to funding to mitigate wildfires.
Who is affected and how:
Short‑term effects: the bill creates an analytical report and recommendations; it imposes no immediate regulatory changes or funding.
Medium‑ to long‑term effects: the study could lead Congress or agencies to amend laws, change program rules, or reallocate funds to better support cross‑boundary wildfire mitigation; such future changes could increase the pace and scale of coordinated mitigation efforts and reduce wildfire risk for communities and infrastructure.
Risks and limits: the study itself does not guarantee policy change or new funding. Implementation of recommendations would require further agency action or separate legislative measures.
Equity and Tribal considerations: because the study explicitly includes Tribal entities, it can surface barriers specific to Tribal governments and recommend targeted fixes to improve Tribal participation in cross‑boundary projects.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Updated 18 hours ago
Last progress June 11, 2025 (8 months ago)