Sponsors (7)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Makes the Mayor of the District of Columbia the primary official with many authorities over the District of Columbia National Guard that are currently assigned by statute to the President, the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, or related federal offices. The bill updates multiple provisions in D.C. law and in federal Titles 10 and 32 to substitute the Mayor for federal or commanding-general references and removes a standalone reference to the D.C. National Guard from the D.C. Home Rule Act. It does not create new funding, deadlines, or programs.
The bill centralizes and clarifies civilian (Mayoral) control over D.C.'s National Guard and militia to speed local oversight and emergency response, but it does so by diminishing federal control and introducing legal, coordination, fiscal, and politicization risks for both local and national actors.
D.C. residents, local elected officials, and local governments: the Mayor gets clear statutory authority over National Guard/militia approvals (appointments, consent to activation/relocation), centralizing civilian control and reducing ambiguity about who decides.
Local governments, law enforcement, and service members in D.C.: shifting certain authorities (call-to-duty, Active Guard/Reserve approvals) to the Mayor can speed local decision-making and emergency response without awaiting separate federal sign-offs.
D.C. administrators and elected leaders: sending board findings and commanding-general recommendations together to the Mayor and clarifying which official must be consulted streamlines oversight and may improve administrative responsiveness.
Federal authorities, national responders, and taxpayers: reducing presidential/federal control over a militia in the national capital increases the risk of conflict between local and federal authorities during national emergencies.
Law enforcement, military personnel, and federal partners: shifting command and judicial/military authorities to the Mayor creates legal uncertainty about federal jurisdiction and complicates coordination with DoD and other federal military or law‑enforcement agencies.
D.C. taxpayers and the Mayor's office: assigning new appointment, supervisory, and activation responsibilities to the Mayor increases administrative burden, potential liabilities, and fiscal responsibilities for local government without providing new funding or staff.
Introduced September 2, 2025 by Eleanor Holmes Norton · Last progress September 2, 2025