This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Transfers many statutory authorities and references about the District of Columbia National Guard from the President (and in some places the commanding general or Secretary of the Army) to the Mayor of the District of Columbia. The changes update D.C. Code and multiple provisions in titles 10 and 32 of the U.S. Code to substitute the Mayor as the named official for appointments, consents, call-to-duty authority, retirement of officers, courts-martial references, and related administrative actions. The bill makes only textual and conforming statutory amendments across federal and local law; it does not create new programs, appropriate funds, set deadlines, or add new agencies or funding streams.
The bill shifts statutory control of the D.C. National Guard toward the Mayor to increase local accountability and responsiveness, but it raises significant coordination, funding, legal-transition, and politicization risks that could complicate federal-local operations and affect service members.
D.C. residents and the District government: the Mayor receives formal statutory authority over D.C. militia/National Guard appointments, orders, and personnel actions, increasing local civilian control and accountability.
Local responders and communities in D.C.: decisions about calling the D.C. militia/Guard for local duties are placed with a locally accountable official (the Mayor), which can improve responsiveness to local emergencies and needs.
D.C. National Guard members and agencies: statutory language and sectional updates reduce ambiguity about who issues orders and appoints certain officers, simplifying legal references and clarifying chains of authority.
Federal and local authorities, and the public during national incidents: shifting control to the Mayor risks conflicts over use of force and activation for national missions, creating legal uncertainty and complicating coordinated responses in emergencies.
D.C. National Guard members: changes in appointment/ordering authorities and transitions to mayoral consent may produce procedural delays, administrative disruption, or legal challenges that affect activations, pay, relocations, and deployments.
D.C. taxpayers and the Mayor's office: transferring statutory responsibilities to the Mayor comes with no new funding in the bill, likely increasing local administrative burden and costs for the District.
Introduced September 2, 2025 by Christopher Van Hollen · Last progress September 2, 2025