Sponsors (16)
The bill makes EDA grant applications easier and more transparent for rural, tribal, and local applicants—lowering applicant burden and improving access—while creating modest new administrative costs and potential eligibility and proposal-evaluation trade-offs.
Rural communities, small business owners, and local governments will face a much simpler, shorter EDA grant application with standardized forms and budget templates, reducing time spent and compliance costs when applying for federal economic development grants.
Tribal areas and territories that meet the bill's definitions will gain tailored application pathways and standardized guidance, improving their access to EDA funds.
Rural communities and local governments will benefit from greater transparency because the EDA will post redacted sample successful applications and decision-criteria guides, helping applicants prepare stronger submissions.
Local governments and rural communities may see some project selection quality issues because a simplified short-form application could omit details reviewers rely on to compare complex proposals.
Communities just above the 10,000-population cutoff could be excluded from the 'rural community' definition and lose eligibility for the streamlined pathway, creating cliff effects and uneven access to aid.
Taxpayers may bear modest additional costs because creating, maintaining, and doing outreach for a short-form application and new guidance will require EDA administrative resources.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Requires the EDA to offer a short-form grant application option and publish standardized guidance and redacted sample successful applications for rural applicants.
Introduced March 3, 2026 by John A. Barrasso · Last progress March 3, 2026
Requires the Economic Development Administration (EDA) to offer a short-form grant application option for applicants in defined rural areas and to publish standardized guidance and redacted sample successful applications. It defines which places count as "rural," asks the EDA to get input from rural stakeholders on length and required documents, and pushes the agency to reduce repetitive federal data requests and provide clear decision guides for applicants.