Sponsors (4)
The resolution reduces earmark-directed spending to curb waste and support deficit reduction, but does so at the expense of locally targeted projects, jobs, and lawmakers' ability to secure investments for their districts.
Taxpayers: limiting earmarks reduces directed spending and discretionary waste, preserving federal dollars for higher-priority programs and modestly aiding efforts to pay down the national debt.
Local communities and construction workers: fewer earmarks will likely reduce funding for local projects that create jobs and build or maintain infrastructure, harming local employment and services.
Local governments and taxpayers: a broad ban on earmarks shifts decision-making toward centralized federal agencies, which can delay projects and make funding less responsive to local priorities.
Members of Congress and their constituents: removing earmarks eliminates a tool representatives use to secure targeted investments for their districts, weakening their ability to deliver local benefits.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Expresses non-binding opposition to congressional earmarks and urges Congress to stop them and reduce federal debt.
Official title: Expressing opposition to congressional spending on earmarks.
Introduced November 20, 2025 by Richard Lynn Scott · Last progress November 20, 2025
Expresses the Senate's non-binding opposition to congressional earmarks (congressionally directed spending), calling their return after a long pause wasteful and a circumvention of Senate rules and urging Congress to stop earmarks and reduce federal debt. The resolution cites large federal debt and deficit figures, high annual interest costs, and CBO debt projections to support its view that earmarks worsen fiscal problems.