The bill strengthens deposit insurance and gives regulators a clearer tool to claw back ill‑gotten pay—boosting accountability and protecting insured deposits—while creating uncertainty, higher legal/compliance costs, and potential negative effects on compensation practices and recoveries for some stakeholders.
Depositors and the general public: recovered compensation from misconduct is deposited into the Deposit Insurance Fund, strengthening its resources and better protecting insured deposits.
Bank customers and taxpayers: the bill creates stronger deterrence by making high‑paid insiders at large banks potentially personally liable for pay tied to misconduct, reducing moral hazard.
FDIC and regulators: provides an explicit statutory tool to recoup ill‑gotten pay after insolvency or resolution, improving accountability and the agency's ability to manage failed banks.
Bank executives and many employees: the bill's broadly defined "covered compensation" could expose various pay forms (including equity and noncash awards) to clawback, creating uncertainty and potential loss of earned pay.
Large banks and their creditors: potential clawback liability increases legal, compliance, and litigation costs during and after failures, which can reduce recoveries available to other creditors and may prolong resolution processes.
Firms recruiting financial talent: heightened clawback risk may complicate compensation design and make pay packages less competitive, hindering recruitment and retention.
Based on analysis of 6 sections of legislative text.
Requires the FDIC to claw back broad forms of compensation from covered parties of large insured banks that caused significant losses and deposit recovered funds into the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Introduced March 11, 2026 by Elizabeth Warren · Last progress March 11, 2026
Requires the FDIC to reclaim ("claw back") certain pay from executives and related parties of large insured banks whose actions caused significant losses, and directs recovered money into the Deposit Insurance Fund. Also clarifies federal law language to make clear that certain statutory provisions apply when the FDIC is appointed as receiver, no matter how that appointment occurs.