Map
Live
US Code
Officials
Committees
Legislation
Rankings
Nominations
Holds
Stocks
Open search page

Text Versions

Text as it was Enrolled Bill
December 18, 2025
View
Text as it was Referred in Senate
July 22, 2025
View
Text as it was Engrossed in House
July 21, 2025
View
Text as it was Reported in House
July 10, 2025
View
Text as it was Introduced in House
January 3, 2025
View
Congress.wiki Alpha
AboutHow Congress WorksSupport UsRoadmapPrivacy PolicyTerms of Service

This is not an official government website.

Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.

United StatesHouse Bill 131HR 131

Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act

Water Resources Development
  1. house

Sponsors (2)

Committee Meetings

1 meeting related to this legislation

House
Markup
Scheduled

Full Committee Markup on: • H.R. 131 (Rep. Boebert), “Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act” • H.R. 183 (Rep. McClintock), “Law Enforcement Officer Recreation Pass Act” • H.R. 261 (Rep. Carter of GA), “Undersea Cable Protection Act of 2025” (Amendments to H.R. 261 must be drafted to the amendment in the nature of a substitute, attached to this notice) • H.R. 410 (Rep. Begich), “Alaska Native Vietnam Era Veterans Land Allotment Extension Act of 2025” • H.R. 504 (Rep. Gimenez), “Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act” • H.R. 655 (Rep. Bentz), “The Dalles Watershed Development Act” • H.R. 725 (Rep. Downing), “Crow Revenue Act” (Amendments to H.R. 725 must be drafted to the amendment in the nature of a substitute, attached to this notice) • H.R. 1276 (Rep. Comer), To remove restrictions from a parcel of land in Paducah, Kentucky. • H.R. 1729 (Rep. Neguse), “Bolts Ditch Act” • H.R. 1917 (Rep. Dingell), “Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025” • H.R. 2250 (Rep. DelBene), “National Landslide Preparedness Act Reauthorization Act of 2025” • H.R. 2316 (Rep. Hurd), “Wetlands Conservation and Access Improvement Act of 2025” • H.R. 2388 (Rep. Randall), “Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Project Lands Restoration Act” • H.R. 2389 (Rep. Randall), “Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act” • H.R. 2556 (Rep. Hunt), “CORE Act of 2025” (Amendments to H.R. 2556 must be drafted to the amendment in the nature of a substitute, attached to this notice) • H.R. 2876 (Rep. Moore of UT), “University of Utah Research Park Act” • H.R. 3168 (Rep. Valadao), “National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025” • H.R. 3176 (Rep. Begich), To amend the John D. Dingell, Jr Conservation Management, and Recreation Act to reauthorize the National volcano Early Warning and Monitoring System. • H.R. 3179 (Rep. Babin), To rename the Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge located in the State of Texas as the "Jocelyn Nungaray National Wildlife Refuge". • H.R. 3937 (Rep. Tiffany), “Wabeno Economic Development Act”

  • senate
  • president
  • Last progress January 8, 2026 (4 weeks ago)

    Introduced on January 3, 2025 by Lauren Boebert

    Committee on Natural ResourcesLongworth House Office Building, 1324Jun 25, 2025 at 2:00 PM
    View Committee

    House Votes

    248 Yea · 5 Not Voting · 1 Present · 177 No — 284 needed
    View roll call details

    Senate Votes

    Passed Voice Vote
    December 16, 2025 (1 month ago)

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

    Presidential Signature

    Vetoed
    December 29, 2025 (1 month ago)

    Vetoed by President Donald J. Trump.

    The legislation returns to Congress, which may attempt to override the veto.

    Laws This Bill Would Affect

    2 amendments
    AmendsPublic Law 87–590 (76 Stat. 389; 123 Stat. 1320)

    Edits subsection (c) and adds a new subsection (d) to the first section to set Arkansas Valley Conduit repayment and operations/maintenance contract terms.

    AmendsPublic Law 87–590 section 2(b)(3)(A)

    Replaces a cross-reference from “this section” to “subsection (d) of the first section”.

    Amendments

    No Amendments

    Related Legislation

    AI Insights

    Analyzed 1 of 1 sections

    Summary

    Requires the Arkansas Valley Conduit contract to cover 35% of the conduit construction cost, permits the remainder to be paid over time, and assigns the contracting parties responsibility for operating, maintaining, and replacing the conduit. The amendment adds these rules into the law that governs the project so that cost-sharing, repayment timing, and long‑term ownership/operation responsibilities are specified in the conduit contract.

    Key Points

    • Requires the Arkansas Valley Conduit contract to cover 35% of conduit construction costs.
    • Permits the remaining conduit costs to be paid over time as specified in the contract.
    • Makes contracting parties responsible for operating, maintaining, and replacing the conduit.
    • Modifies the statutory framework governing the project so contract terms must reflect these requirements.
    • Does not itself appropriate federal funds; it sets allocation and repayment rules for project costs.
    • Shifts long‑term lifecycle obligations (O&M and replacement) onto the conduit contracting parties.
    • Implementation depends on executing or amending the conduit contract consistent with the new rules.

    Categories & Tags

    Agencies
    Secretary
    Secretary of the Treasury
    Subjects
    water infrastructure
    domestic water supply
    repayment terms
    operations and maintenance
    statutory amendment

    Provisions

    7 items

    In the first section, subsection (c), in the second sentence, the text "; and" is struck (removed) from that sentence.

    amendment

    Adds a new subsection (d) titled "Arkansas valley conduit" to the first section of Public Law 87–590.

    amendment
    Affects: Arkansas Valley Conduit contract / contracting parties

    The contract for the Arkansas Valley Conduit must provide for payment equal to 35 percent of the cost of the conduit, notwithstanding the reclamation laws or any other provision of this Act.

    requirement
    Affects: Contract for the Arkansas Valley Conduit; contracting parties

    Contract payments shall consist of funding provided during construction from any entity other than the Secretary.

    requirement
    Affects: Any entity other than the Secretary providing construction funding

    Contract payments shall also consist of, based on a demonstration of financial hardship as determined by the Secretary, repayment of the balance not covered under subparagraph (A) for a period of not more than 75 years with simple interest at a rate equal to 50 percent of the interest rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 2(c). This repayment may include revenue derived from contracts for the use of excess capacity or exchange contracts using Fryingpan-Arkansas project facilities.

    requirement
    Affects: Contracting parties, Secretary, Secretary of the Treasury; revenues from Fryingpan-Arkansas project contracts
    ColoradosenatorMichael F. Bennet
    Affected Groups
    Local Governments
    Water system operators and water utilities
    Irrigation districts and local water management entities
    Agricultural communities
    +2 more
    S-296 · Bill

    Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act

    1. senate
    2. house
    3. president

    Updated 2 days ago

    Last progress January 29, 2025 (1 year ago)

    Section Details

    Expand sections to see detailed analysis

    Impact Analysis

    Directly affected: local governments, water utilities/irrigation districts, and other contracting parties tied to the Arkansas Valley Conduit. Those entities must provide a 35% covered share of conduit construction costs up front (or as provided by contract), accept repayment schedules for the remaining balance, and assume ongoing obligations to operate, maintain, and replace conduit infrastructure. Practically, this will require revised financial plans, potential borrowing or rate adjustments, updated operations budgets, and administrative actions to amend or execute contracts reflecting the new statutory terms. Indirectly affected groups include residents, farmers, and businesses that will receive water services through the conduit — they could see changes in user rates, assessments, or service timelines depending on how contracting parties finance construction and long‑term upkeep. The change is narrowly targeted to project contracting rules and should accelerate clarity on cost allocation and long‑term responsibilities, but it also concentrates lifecycle cost risk on local partners rather than creating new direct federal appropriations.