Sponsors (4)
This bill clarifies the statutory definition for dependent-child coverage in federal health plans—potentially securing coverage and easing administration for many federal families, but risking reduced eligibility for some and short-term administrative disruption depending on how the definition is applied.
Federal employees and their families may see clearer or expanded dependent-child coverage under FEHB/FEHBP for children under age 26 if the definition broadens, preserving or extending health benefits and reducing uncertainty about eligibility.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will have clearer statutory language to administer benefits, likely reducing disputes and making eligibility determinations more consistent.
If the revised definition narrows eligibility, federal employees and their families could lose dependent coverage for children under 26 and face higher out-of-pocket health costs.
Changing the statutory definition could create short-term confusion and extra administrative burden for OPM and employees while guidance and rules are updated.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Replaces the statutory definition in 5 U.S.C. § 8901(5) to change how dependent children up to age 26 qualify for FEHB and FEDVIP coverage.
Introduced February 13, 2025 by Julia Brownley · Last progress February 13, 2025
Amends the federal employee benefits statute by changing the text of 5 U.S.C. § 8901(5), which defines terms used in chapter 89 and governs dependent-child eligibility for FEHB/FEDVIP coverage through age 26. The bill contains a short-title provision and a single substantive amendment to the statutory definition that will affect whether and how dependent children qualify for federal health and vision/dental plans up to age 26.