This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires the EPA Administrator to change a vehicle emissions regulation within 120 days so that flexible-fuel vehicles (FFVs) can be counted as having 31% lower carbon monoxide (CO) grams-per-mile for fleet-average CO compliance. It also allows the EPA to adopt a larger CO reduction for FFVs later if a newer Argonne GREET model supports a bigger decrease. The bill includes a finding about E85 corn-starch ethanol reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 37% per mile versus gasoline and sets definitions for key terms used in the rule change.
The bill provides clearer regulatory definitions and eases compliance burdens for automakers (reducing legal uncertainty and costs) but does so in ways that risk weakening real-world emissions and public-health outcomes by allowing compliance credits without guaranteed on-road reductions and by accelerating rule changes with limited input.
EPA, state governments, and vehicle manufacturers get clearer enforcement and regulatory consistency by tying the 'flexible fuel vehicle' definition and enforcement authority to existing EPA regulations and Clean Air Act definitions, reducing duplicative rulemaking and legal ambiguity.
Automakers can count flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) as 31% lower in CO for fleet-average compliance, lowering manufacturers' compliance costs and reducing the risk of penalties.
All U.S. residents could see lower lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions if vehicles use E85 (corn ethanol), and the bill lets EPA increase the authorized reduction if updated lifecycle (GREET) modeling supports it, enabling standards to follow improved science.
Urban and other local communities could experience higher localized CO pollution because treating FFVs as 31% lower for compliance may not produce equivalent on-road tailpipe reductions.
Manufacturers may gain compliance credits without delivering real emissions reductions, reducing incentives to produce cleaner vehicles and undermining regulatory stringency.
The 120-day deadline for EPA to act risks rushed rulemaking, limited analysis, and curtailed public input on substantive changes to emissions compliance.
Introduced July 15, 2025 by Amy Klobuchar · Last progress July 15, 2025