Ask me why this bill matters.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Allows an existing USDA loan authority to be used to make loans to agricultural producers to build or upgrade propane storage facilities used primarily for agricultural production, and updates the list of eligible uses of program funds. The change uses the existing regulatory definition of “agricultural production” in 7 CFR 4279.2 as of the date of enactment to determine what storage projects qualify.
Amends the opening funding language of Section 1614(a) to provide funds for "producers" (replacement of the existing text with new wording).
Adds a new paragraph authorizing loans to agricultural producers to construct or upgrade storage facilities for propane that is primarily used for agricultural production, with the term "agricultural production" defined by reference to 7 C.F.R. §4279.2 as in effect on the date of enactment.
Primary affected groups: agricultural producers (farmers and ranchers) who rely on propane for crop drying, heating, irrigation pumping, livestock operations, and other farm uses will gain a new financing option to build or upgrade on-farm propane storage. That can lower operating costs through bulk purchasing, improve fuel access during peak seasons, and reduce delivery frequency. Secondary effects will be felt by propane distributors and transporters (potentially larger deliveries but fewer trips), manufacturers and installers of storage tanks and safety equipment, and local contractors who do site work.
Administrative and program effects: the administering USDA component will incorporate propane storage projects into existing loan-review workflows, including underwriting, collateral, repayment schedules, and required environmental and safety compliance. The reference to 7 CFR 4279.2 means program staff will determine project eligibility according to the regulatory definition of "agricultural production" in force at enactment; that could limit or broaden which storage projects qualify depending on regulatory language. The statutory change does not itself authorize appropriations or alter non-loan regulatory requirements (zoning, hazardous-material handling, state permitting), so recipients will still need to meet those separate rules.
Risks and considerations: expanding loan eligibility to liquid-fuel storage raises safety, siting, and environmental concerns (spill prevention, fire risk, secondary containment, local permitting). Agencies will need to ensure existing environmental assessments and technical standards are applied to mitigate those risks. Market impacts are likely modest and localized; large increases in on-farm storage could change ordering patterns for suppliers and logistics providers. Because the amendment changes eligibility but not program funding levels in the text provided, uptake will depend on available loan authority and USDA program capacity to process applications.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
GRAIN DRY Act
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced February 13, 2025 by Brad Finstad · Last progress February 13, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced in House