Sponsors (2)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a set of changes to how the federal HOME housing program is administered. It narrows when full NEPA environmental reviews apply for many small or infill HOME projects and directs HUD to avoid duplicative environmental reviews; limits Build America, Buy America and Section 3 workforce rules for certain small projects; expands the definition of eligible infill housing and allows HOME funds to pay for nearby infrastructure in non‑entitlement areas; changes income and eligibility language (raising several numeric cutoffs from 95% to 110% of a referenced figure and replacing “low‑income” with an explicit 100% of area median income standard); modifies homeownership and tenant‑assisted unit rules (including limited exceptions for military and heirs); and relaxes a CHDO set‑aside recapture requirement after 24 months. HUD must issue implementing regulations for several changes within one year of enactment.
The bill aims to accelerate small affordable housing and related infrastructure projects and expand some eligibility and homeownership pathways by reducing federal review and compliance burdens, but it trades off environmental safeguards, local hiring and nonprofit protections, and priority for the very lowest‑income households.
Low‑income renters, local developers, and state/local governments can get affordable housing built faster because the bill reduces duplicative federal reviews (NEPA) and other federal requirements and allows recaptured/uninvested set‑aside funds to be reused more quickly.
State and local recipients of Subtitle A and other small projects face narrower Buy America and Section 3 obligations, lowering procurement and compliance burdens for small projects and reducing administrative time/costs.
Families at or below the program threshold gain clearer, more uniform eligibility rules and municipalities get a defined 'infill housing project' standard, reducing ambiguity for applicants and enabling planners to identify qualifying small urban sites.
Nearby communities and the environment may face greater risk of habitat loss, pollution, or other harms because removing or limiting NEPA and similar reviews reduces environmental safeguards and public input opportunities.
Low‑income residents and local workers may lose hiring and contracting opportunities because reduced Section 3 requirements and narrower Buy America coverage can limit local hiring preferences and demand for U.S. materials/contractors.
Very low‑income households risk losing access as raising eligibility thresholds (100% or 110% AMI in different provisions) and broader definitions can increase program demand and allocate some resources to higher‑income households.
Introduced October 31, 2025 by Mike Flood · Last progress October 31, 2025