Sponsors
The bill expands access and competition by allowing commercial and non‑government experience to count and strengthens procurement integrity, potentially producing more cost‑efficient DoD contracts, but it raises short‑term administrative costs, can favor better‑resourced firms, and risks awarding work to companies less familiar with unique DoD requirements.
Small and nontraditional firms (including small-business owners and nontraditional defense contractors) will have greater access to DoD contracting opportunities because commercial and non‑government project experience can be considered and procedural barriers are reduced, increasing competition for contracts.
Taxpayers may benefit from higher-quality, more cost-efficient DoD contracts if evaluations prioritize cost-efficiency and quality, producing better value for defense spending.
Validation requirements (attestations and verifiable contacts) strengthen procurement integrity by reducing the risk of false references and protecting the DoD from fraudulent past‑performance claims.
Awarding contracts more broadly on the basis of commercial past performance could lead to contracts going to firms unfamiliar with unique DoD requirements, risking program performance and national security implications.
Greater use of demonstrations, prototypes, or testing as evaluation methods may advantage better‑resourced firms and disadvantage some small businesses that cannot afford extensive prototyping.
Revising regulations and issuing new guidance could impose short‑term administrative and compliance costs on the DoD and contractors during the transition period, with taxpayers ultimately bearing some costs.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Directs DoD to accept and validate non-government past performance, remove barriers for small and nontraditional contractors, and implement non-legislative fixes to increase competition.
Introduced December 17, 2025 by Gary C. Peters · Last progress December 17, 2025
Requires the Secretary of Defense to issue new guidance within one year on when and how to accept and validate non-government past performance (including commercial work) and on using alternative evaluation methods for requirements without prior government precedent. It also directs the Secretary to work with the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council to remove procedural barriers that disproportionately affect small businesses and nontraditional defense contractors, get public input, identify needed legislative or regulatory changes, implement non-legislative fixes within two years, and brief congressional armed services committees on actions taken. The law defines the terms “nontraditional defense contractors” and “small business concern,” directs the Secretary to prioritize cost-efficiency and quality in contracting, and requires specific timelines for guidance, council convening, implementation, and briefings. The goal is to increase competition and make it easier for nontraditional and small firms to compete for Defense contracts while ensuring past-performance information can include commercial references and alternative demonstrations where appropriate.