Select Committee on Intelligence. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Cotton. Without written report.
Updated 5 days ago
Last progress September 8, 2025 (5 months ago)
Last progress July 17, 2025 (6 months ago)
Introduced on July 17, 2025 by Thomas Bryant Cotton
Authorizes funding for U.S. intelligence activities for FY2026, sets classified funding levels and limits on transfers, and provides $514 million for the CIA retirement and disability fund. It creates new criminal penalties for trespass at marked intelligence facilities, tightens classification and declassification rules, expands reporting and oversight requirements, strengthens whistleblower protections for intelligence community personnel, and restricts certain contracts with Chinese military‑linked biotech firms. Requires multiple organizational changes across the intelligence community: a DNI-led plan to reduce ODNI staff while protecting employees from involuntary termination in most cases; transfers of certain counterproliferation duties to the CIA; new standards and reporting on anomalous health incidents; and creation of a DNI-run Technology Bridge Fund to accelerate prototype and acquisition transitions with up to $75 million authorized annually. The bill also imposes numerous deadlines for reports, Inspector General reviews, and agency policy changes to be completed after enactment.
Defines the term "congressional intelligence committees" by referring to the meaning given in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Defines the term "intelligence community" by referring to the meaning given in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Authorizes funds to be appropriated for fiscal year 2026 for the conduct of the intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the Federal Government.
States that the amounts authorized under section 101 are those specified in the classified Schedule of Authorizations prepared to accompany this Act.
Requires that the classified Schedule of Authorizations be made available to the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and to the President.
Primary effects:
Intelligence community agencies and personnel: Multiple operational, organizational, and managerial changes will directly affect DNI, ODNI, CIA, NSA, FBI, and related components through staff reductions at ODNI, duty transfers to CIA, revised appointment authorities for senior officials, and many new reporting and policy obligations. These changes will reshape internal procedures and require administrative implementation work.
Federal employees and detailees: ODNI staff face a mandated staffing reduction plan with protections against involuntary terminations in most cases; detailees may be returned to home agencies on timelines. Employees remain subject to removal for documented misconduct or poor performance.
Contractors and vendor community: New restrictions on contractor collection and sale of location data at intelligence sites and prohibitions on certain contracts with Chinese military‑linked biotech companies will affect procurement and compliance obligations. The Technology Bridge Fund creates new opportunities for small businesses and nontraditional vendors to obtain support for prototype transition, but places on prioritization and reporting apply.
Small businesses/nontraditional defense contractors: Eligible firms can access the Tech Bridge Fund to accelerate transition and government acquisition of technology, potentially expanding participation in intelligence-focused procurement. The DNI’s prioritization could favor firms that meet small/nontraditional criteria.
Congress and oversight bodies: Congressional intelligence committees gain additional reports, declassification products, and IG referrals; many statutory deadlines increase the volume of oversight material and require timely briefings.
Civil liberties and privacy stakeholders: A new trespass offense, restricted disclosure of classified budget details, and some expanded agency authorities may raise concerns among civil liberties groups regarding transparency and rights; at the same time, limits on contractor location-data sales and stronger whistleblower protections could mitigate some privacy and accountability concerns.
Foreign relations and industry tied to China/Russia: Measures restricting contracts with certain Chinese-linked biotech firms and mandatory country-specific reports/assessments could affect foreign partner engagement, industry participants with ties to targeted entities, and diplomatic relations, especially where visas and travel restrictions are imposed.
Overall effect and implementation burden:
Updated 2 days ago
Last progress June 26, 2025 (7 months ago)
Updated 2 days ago
Last progress July 24, 2025 (6 months ago)
Updated 2 days ago
Last progress July 10, 2025 (7 months ago)
SPIES Act
Updated 2 days ago
Last progress July 9, 2025 (7 months ago)