Sponsors (3)
The bill clarifies fund designation and fee-allocation language to improve government administration and industry predictability, but it risks reallocating fees in ways that could reduce protections or funding for taxpayers and government entities and creates short-term uncertainty until full text is disclosed.
State and local governments will have clearer fund designation and simplified transfer language, enabling faster deployment and administration of funds.
Utilities, energy companies, and government contractors will face more predictable fee-allocation rules, improving their planning and financial predictability.
Taxpayers and state governments could lose prior protections or funding streams if the revised fee language effectively reallocates fees.
State and local governments and affected companies may face short-term uncertainty about permitted fee uses because replacement text is omitted in the excerpt, leaving details unclear until full text is available.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Introduced March 5, 2026 by Mike Kennedy · Last progress March 5, 2026
Makes narrow, technical amendments to the Mineral Leasing Act's fee-transfer language in 30 U.S.C. § 191(d) and establishes a short title for the bill. The changes replace and revise wording in three paragraphs of the statute, most notably substituting the phrase "the Fund" where prior transfer language appeared, but the excerpt does not include the full new text for two of the revised paragraphs or specify dollar amounts, recipients, or timing.