Updated 6 hours ago
Last progress March 6, 2025 (11 months ago)
LIVE Beneficiaries Act
Updated 4 hours ago
Last progress February 20, 2025 (11 months ago)
Lower Costs for Everyday Americans Act
Updated 6 hours ago
Last progress March 3, 2025 (11 months ago)
Requires States to check death records regularly and remove deceased people from Medicaid/CHIP rolls. Starting January 1, 2027, States must review the Social Security Death Master File at least quarterly (or other electronic sources that meet requirements), disenroll people who appear deceased, stop future payments to them, and promptly restore coverage retroactively if a death was recorded in error. Aims to reduce improper payments and keep program rolls accurate, while requiring States to follow Medicaid eligibility rules and to reinstate benefits quickly when mistakes occur. States may need new processes or systems to do these checks and manage corrections.
Amend Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) subsection (a): in paragraph (86) change punctuation by striking and inserting a semicolon.
Amend Section 1902 subsection (a): in paragraph (87)(D) change punctuation by replacing the period at the end with "; and".
Amend Section 1902 subsection (a) by inserting new paragraph (88) requiring that the State comply with the eligibility verification requirements under new subsection (uu), but stating that paragraph (88) applies only to the 50 States and the District of Columbia.
Add new subsection (uu) establishing eligibility verification requirements that begin January 1, 2027.
States must, not less frequently than quarterly, review the Death Master File to determine whether any individuals enrolled for medical assistance under the State plan (or waiver of such plan) are deceased.
Who is affected and how:
Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries: Most directly affected when matches signal death; legitimate deceased beneficiaries will be removed from rolls, while beneficiaries who are mistakenly matched to death records face temporary disenrollment until errors are corrected and coverage is restored retroactively.
State Medicaid agencies and program administrators: Bear primary responsibility for implementing quarterly matching, updating enrollment systems, stopping payments, processing appeals and reinstatements, and ensuring compliance with federal Medicaid rules; this will create new ongoing operational and IT tasks.
Medicaid managed care organizations and health-care providers: Could see payments stopped if a beneficiary is removed; providers may face delays in reimbursement until discrepancies are resolved or coverage is reinstated retroactively.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and federal oversight: Will oversee compliance and may provide guidance or audits; federal program integrity goals (reducing improper payments) are advanced.
Taxpayers and budgets: Potential reduction in improper payments to deceased individuals may produce savings; conversely, states may incur implementation costs (system upgrades, staff time) that could be unfunded unless separate funding is provided.
Operational risks and tradeoffs:
Overall effect: Improves enrollment accuracy and program integrity but shifts implementation and operational costs and responsibilities to States and may require careful operational safeguards to prevent or quickly fix wrongful disenrollments.
Last progress February 18, 2025 (11 months ago)
Introduced on February 18, 2025 by Gus Bilirakis
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Updated 6 hours ago
Last progress July 4, 2025 (7 months ago)