Sponsors (2)
The bill aims to use EDA grants to bring manufacturing and jobs back to U.S. communities and provide related worker training, at the cost of higher federal spending and the risk that funds are unequally distributed or diverted from other development priorities.
State and local governments and communities can receive EDA grants to attract companies relocating operations from abroad and to expand domestic manufacturing, creating local jobs and new local investment.
Workers may gain access to new training, technical assistance, and research programs tied to manufacturing growth and onshoring projects, improving skills and employability.
Taxpayers may face higher federal spending to subsidize relocation and manufacturing expansion through EDA grants.
Redirecting EDA support toward onshoring and manufacturing might reduce funding available for other economic development needs (for example, non-manufacturing projects or long-term distressed areas).
Using EDA funds to attract relocating firms could favor some communities or businesses over others, producing uneven economic outcomes and competitive imbalances.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Expands EDA grant purposes to explicitly fund relocation of jobs from abroad and to support U.S. manufacturing growth, including related training and technical assistance.
Amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to let the Economic Development Administration (EDA) explicitly fund projects that help companies relocate employment from outside the United States to U.S. locations and that support growth in the manufacturing sector. It also adds those relocation and manufacturing-growth purposes to the EDA's training, research, and technical assistance grant authorities. The bill does not specify new funding levels.
Introduced February 4, 2026 by Jeff Hurd · Last progress March 25, 2026