Sponsors (4)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced March 27, 2025 by Jeanne Shaheen · Last progress March 27, 2025
Conditions federal mortgage insurance and purchases by Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac on manufactured-home community owners using pad-site leases that include a baseline set of tenant protections. It requires owners to certify and provide lease documentation to HUD or FHFA before loans are insured or purchased, establishes penalties and minimum tenant remedies for violations, and bans sale or purchase incentives that reward weaker protections. The bill also creates a 16-member commission to recommend stronger lending-linked tenant protections within one year, requires HUD/FHFA to publish a public list of covered properties, directs FHFA to develop a standard site-lease for enterprise purchase eligibility, and forbids new appropriations for implementation (costs must come from existing HUD/FHFA funds).
The bill increases tenant protections and seeks to expand mortgage access for manufactured-home residents by tying financing incentives to standardized leases and protections, but it also imposes new compliance burdens and relies on agency implementation without new funding—creating risks of higher costs for owners/residents and pressure on HUD/FHFA resources.
Renters in manufactured-home communities gain stronger tenant protections: one-year renewable leases, limits on terminations, cure periods before eviction, rights to sell homes in place, and new monetary remedies for violations.
Homeowners in certified or standardized communities should see expanded mortgage access and potentially lower financing costs because enterprise purchase eligibility and pricing incentives (for compliant owners/lenders) make loans more marketable.
Taxpayers face no new direct federal appropriations because the Act bars new funding, limiting immediate growth in federal spending.
HUD, FHFA, or other agencies must absorb implementation costs within existing budgets, which could force cuts, delays, or slower rulemaking and reduce services for current HUD program beneficiaries.
Owners and lenders face new compliance, documentation, monitoring, and certification burdens (and steep penalties for noncompliance, including multi-year bans on federally backed financing), which can impose administrative costs that may be passed to residents or threaten owners' finances.
Smaller or informal park owners who cannot meet criteria or absorb compliance costs may lose access to discounted financing or buyers, reducing investor interest, lowering property values, and potentially decreasing maintenance or prompting sales/closures.